Sunday, February 17, 2008

Mythology Rewriting History

In the post-Vatican II world of the kinder, gentler Catholicism of Dignitatis Humanae, Catholics have this need to show that Rome was always just as kind and gentle as it was under the saintly grandfather figure of John Paul II. One effect of this has been a retelling of the Reformation in terms of the huffy, arrogant, rash Protestants abandoning the Roman communion when they needed to be patient and wait, as the kindly Leo X was doing everything he could to take care of things in the most pastoral, open-minded and even-handed way possible. Death sentences, closed councils, and military subjugation aren't really part of the picture.

Right, where was I?

So I'm teaching a Sunday school class on Gene Veith's Spirituality of the Cross, and one particular girl is bringing her Catholic boyfriend. We got to talking about the Reformation, as is common in Lutheran Sunday Schools, and this fellow said, "My mother told me that Luther was invited to the Council of Trent, but he refused to go." If you know the history, you'd know that Luther died shortly after the council convened, and that the eventual delegation led by Brenz was never heard (not that it would have made any difference). In particular, the confession Brenz wrote (which I am highly interested in reading some day) was not read, although Pedro de Soto eventually wrote against it. If I recall correctly from one of my Confessions classes, they weren't even admitted to the city proper, but were detained in a hamlet in the vicinity, where they were allowed to talk to a delegate who made it quite clear that nothing they said would be presented at the council. Now I have no idea where his mother heard this, but it seems pretty clear that this historical "fact" is a product of this new mythology of the Reformation. It makes me wonder what other "facts" are floating around out there.

Update: An intrepid commenter may have found the source of this particular nugget of disinformation. John Dimascio posts it here. Apparently, once you rise to the level of Internet Apologist, you are imbued with the power to recreate history by the force of your will.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

If you google it Catholic Apologist John DiMascio supports that statement at askacatholic.com

I like their disclaimer.

Eric H.

Jim Roemke said...

I have always wondered what Catholic High Schools teach about the Reformation. Maybe that would be a good place to find some interesting "mythology."

Tom R said...

See http://fathermckenzie.blogspot.com/2008/02/godfried-daneels-meets-anthony-daniels.html:

'... #8. When Obi-Wan says "Millions of voices cried out in terror - and were suddenly silenced", Luke corrects this vilification of the Empire: "In fact, recent scholarship by unbiased researchers has proven conclusively that (a) fewer than 300 or 400 people overall died in the destruction of Alderaan, (b) of those who did die, at least 90 billion were engaged in aggressive terrorism against the Empire, so killing them was an act of self-defence, (c) officially-sanctioned translations of the Death Star plans into Standard Droidspeak were circulating at least two or three centuries before Alderaan was allegedly destroyed - which proves that Alderaan was in fact destroyed by the Rebel Alliance, not by the Empire. That is, if it ever truly existed...'

I went to a Catholic high school. The line is (or in the mid-1980s was) basically: "(1) Luther, Calvin et al were entirely correct that there were corrupt abuses in Catholic practice, eg, fornicating clergy, sale of indulgences, etc; (2) but there's no more fornicating clergy or sale of indulgences in the modern Catholic Church; (3) thankfully, our Protestant brethren are startiing to realise this and to put aside their ancient, outmoded, 400-year-old hatreds; (4) but there still remain a handful who reject the ancient, timeless, 2,000-year-old truths of Catholicism (as re-declared in 1963-65), or who are swayed by modern trends."

(I paraphrase slightly.)

There's also the sub-line that "Luther (and sometimes Calvin also) only meant to clean up the abuses, like Erasmus and Thomas More, but they created a monster they could not control when other Prot. sects, in turn, broke away from their own state churches." (Subtext: a Nelson Muntz "ha-ha!").

Tom R said...

"Pope Benedict XVI is to rehabilitate Martin Luther, arguing that he did not intend to split Christianity but only to purge the Church of corrupt practices."

See: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3492299.ece

But cavete:

http://amywelborn.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/do-you-remember-rule-27/

and

http://ncrcafe.org/node/941

"Rule #27... If the news story is from the British press and involves the Pope... DON’T BELIEVE IT." (Amy Welborn)