On the radio this morning, one of the talk show hosts spoke sneeringly of some other fellow for "having a fetish for unsafe sex." I about ran off the road. So wait, having sex without mechanical intervention is now a fetish? Doing it the way every living thing except Western man in the last few decades has done is now abnormal? That's how far off the rails we've gone. "Normal" and "healthy" sex is actively and continually suppressing fundamental parts of your nature as a sexual being. How much longer until we classify pregnancy as a disease?
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Well, there was the classic Onion piece a year or two back: Woman Overjoyed By Giant Uterine Parasite.
How much longer until we classify pregnancy as a disease?
medicine: the art or science of restoring or preserving health or due physical condition, as by means of drugs, surgical operations or appliances, or manipulations: often divided into medicine proper, surgery, and obstetrics.
Well, if an abortion is ever refered to as a "medical procedure," they are defining pregnancy as a condition to be cured. Same thing goes if an abortion is covered under "health" insurance, if the person performing the procedure is called a "doctor," (doctors heal an ill) etc.
That is one of the most brilliant things I have ever read.
Cool- I have a fetish ;-P Maybe chastity will become classified as a fetish, too. Modest is hottest, you know!
Relax Josh. Having sex without protection is normal.
Having sex with a prostitute without protection?
I think that can be legitimately catagorized as "fetish". Or maybe just stupid.
The point wasn't just sex with a hooker, but definitely sex without protection. A couple years ago, they were talking about how swinging is "healthy."
Sarah, chastity isn't a "fetish." It's "repression."
Post a Comment